Categories
Sermons

Beware of the Kids :- John 6:1-12

You know the story of the Emperor’s new clothes.

The Emperor was a very vain man.  He loved fine clothes.  A parade was coming up on his Imperial calendar; it was time to get a new outfit.  So tailors were invited to come up with something that was fit for an Emperor.

Emperor's New ClothesTwo confidence tricksters, who knew of the Emperor’s vanity and his love of clothes, came forward.  They told the Emperor that they could produce a set of clothes for him that would be so fine and exquisite that those with common eyes would not even be able to see them.  Only those whose tastes were noble and refined, like the Emperor’s, would be able to appreciate them.

Well that well and truly appealed to the Emperor’s sense of superiority, and the two tricksters got the job.  They insisted on working in secret, and they frequently came back to ask for money for this material or that.  It was turning into the most expensive set of garments the Emperor had ever had made.  ‘Still,’ the Emperor reasoned, ‘that was to be expected given the exquisiteness of the outfit.’

Finally the day to try on the outfit arrived.  With great anticipation the Emperor entered the fitting room.  But to his horror when the tricksters displayed what they said was the outfit the Emperor couldn’t see it.  They made a great show of helping him into it.  Smoothing a wrinkle here, removing a thread there, and they pronounced it a perfect fit.  The Emperor looked at himself in the mirror.  It was not any more visible to him with the mirror, than it was without it.

The Emperor is a snob, and he is caught by that.  He is too embarrassed to question what he is being told by the tricksters, because that might mean admitting that he is too common and unrefined to see what they are telling him is there.  And what if members of his court can see them and he can’t?  That would mean that there were people in his court who were more noble and refined than he is.  So he acts as though he can see them.  And he goes in the parade wearing his wonderful new costume, which is so exquisite that only those of noble tastes can see it.

And his entire court goes along with it.  They are either as snobbish as he is, or they are aware of who pays their bills.  And so the parade goes on, until a child who has no social etiquette whatsoever, nor any political sense ….  a child who is not afraid to trust what his eyes tell him, asks his parents in an over loud voice, ‘Why isn’t the Emperor wearing any clothes?’

And so the child becomes the truth teller for the crowd and the Emperor.  He gives permission to the people to acknowledge what is in front of their eyes.  He may be watching an Emperor, but that child is, at that point, the most powerful person on the street.

…..

Old_family_photo_by_allwellHave a look at this photo.  It illustrates a social and family expectation.

It is telling us that these boys are miniatures of their Father.  They are dressed like him; they stand in the same pose as him.  They are growing into him.  (If there had been girls, perhaps they would have sat on the near side of their mother on chairs that got progressively smaller).

Remember the boy in the story who told it as he saw it.  Remember the times when children, whom you know, have done that.  Do not discount the wisdom that is sitting there in your children and grandchildren, your nephews and nieces and great nephews and nieces.  Let’s not make the mistake of thinking that we are the only ones with things to teach.  That they are empty containers waiting for all our knowledge and wisdom.  That they are somehow meant to echo everything that we think and so reassure us of our conclusions and our prejudices.  God did not give us our children to make them into miniatures of ourselves.

Yes we will undoubtedly shape them, and they may end up having interests and views of life and of God that are not far different from our own….  Or they may not.  For those who keep an eye on children, one of the hardest things to learn and relearn is that those under our care need the freedom to make their own journeys at their own pace.  To allow someone that freedom is an act of love.

We are not the same people as we were at 5 or 15, or for the older among us, 25, 45, 60…  We need to allow others that same privilege of growth and discovery.  If we do that we may be in a place to make some discoveries of our own, through them.  Remember the boy in the story.

It is quite possible that the children whom we rub shoulders with, may grasp a part of the truth that we have never noticed or have long since forgotten.  Their journey may encourage and inform our own.

…..

The story of the Feeding of the 5000 is found in all four gospels.  John’s account is the only one that mentions the boy.  The other gospels just give a count of the loaves and the fish.  John’s mention of the boy is responsible for turning this story into the Sunday School lesson favourite that it has become.  This is a story that is frequently used to teach our children that even children can do helpful, kind things (which is true, children can do kind and helpful things, and we would want to encourage them to do so).  However we don’t want to be eyeballing the children to let the adults off the hook.  You see the real barb in this story is for the adults.

Beware of the kidsLet’s have a think about that boy in the Bible.

How did he know that Jesus and his disciples were talking about food and how to cater for the crowd.  For that boy to know, he was most likely close in to where Jesus and his disciples were.  He was not among a bunch of kids mucking about on the edge of the crowd at the lake shore.

Did Andrew see him nearby and notice his lunch box?  Or had the boy wormed his way through the crowd (as children are good at doing)?  Was he watching, and did he overhear Jesus and the disciples conversing and so offer what he had to Andrew?

The story doesn’t tell us.  But when Andrew, the disciple, draws attention to the boy, Andrew doesn’t do it because he believes it is the solution to the catering problem.  He does it as a possibility to be discarded.  ‘There’s a boy here with 5 little loaves of barley bread and a couple of fish.  But what good is that with all these people?’  It is a bit like saying, ‘well we could go that way, but we know that just around the corner the bridge is out, so we wouldn’t get very far.’

But even if Andrew didn’t see it as a solution, I think that the boy may have offered it as a solution.  Interestingly, Jesus takes it as one, or uses it as the basis for one.  This is a subversive story.  The gospel readings talk about a crowd of around 5000 men.  They don’t count the women and the kids, though we know that women were among Jesus’ disciples and this boy indicates the presence of children.  It was a mixed group of varying ages who had come out to hear Jesus.  Around 5000 men in that crowd, but the germ of a solution has come from one of those who weren’t counted.  It has come from a child.

It can be foolish and arrogant to discount the ones that don’t count.

Beware of the kids….  The ones that tell it like it is, that tell the truth….  The ones that observe and wonder….  The ones that aren’t put off from doing or suggesting something because the grownups think it is impractical.  If you want a staid and settled life instead of a continuing journey, watch out for those kids.

 

Categories
Faith Explorers Recent Topics

23 May 2016: “The New Testament” a series of video Lectures by Prof Bart D. Ehrman. Lecture 2 ‘The Greco-Roman Context’ led by Hugh

The key point Ehrman makes in this lecture is that if the context is different the meaning of words change.  As an example “I love this course’ can be interpreted in the context of a golf course, a course of study, a meal course, a river course.  By emphasising the word ‘love’ it could also be heard as being cynical.

The period 300 BCE to 300 CE is known as the Greco-Roman period characterised by cults/paganism.  The area dominated by the Greek language for business, culture and learning was conquered by the Romans.  This was an agrarian economy, which looked for providence from many gods, controlled by Pax Romanu with a common language (Greek), coinage and a good road/communications network.

Characteristics of the pagan or cult society at that time were identified as:

  • Acceptance that there were were many gods – poly-theistic
  • It was accepted that all gods were valid, tolerated; there were gods acknowledged by the Roman state that had to be acknowledged through festivals; all others were a matter for the individual. [Not worshipping the state gods could be seen as insurrection.]
  • There was not a constant, daily devotion to one’s gods; religion was a matter of practice (sacrifice, prayers etc) not ethics.
  • Worship was through the practice of the cultic acts – largely sacrifices. The gods had to be appeased!
  • There was no belief in the afterlife; just day-to-day living was on the edge of survival so securing the favour of the gods was to ensure continued existence.
  • There was a hierarchy of gods from Zeus etc, down to ‘divine humans’ who were the result of a god and a human mother. Apollonius of Tyana was one with many parallels with the life story to Jesus. Stories of such ‘divine humans’ were not uncommon.  Note that we still have lower level gods today – eg saints such as St Christopher, Mary, etc.  In this sense at least, Christianity is not monotheistic.

Note that Judaism stood largely apart from these concepts of the pagan cults, apart from the practice of sacrifices.

Categories
Faith Explorers Recent Topics

9 May 2016: “The New Testament” a series of video Lectures by Prof Bart D. Ehrman. Lecture 1 ‘The Early Christians and Their Literature’ led by Hugh

The accompanying notes to first first lecture include: ‘The New Testament is undoubtedly the single most important book in the history of Western civilisation, whether seen as a religious book of faith or as a cultural artefact.  It is probably also the most widely disputed and misunderstood.’  We agree with both observations.  The Bible is the root of our culture, it provides a sense of hope, it is often invoked and misquoted to support both sides of the same argument!  In this course, Ehrman has chosen to study the Bible from the perspective of its Historical context ie what was it’s meaning to people of the time of the original writings?

Knowledge of some of the basic facts about the NT is very low amongst today’s young people.  Which books should be included in the Canon which forms the NT, were in much dispute in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th centuries.   The present 27 books we have today was first included in a letter written by Athanasius bishop of Alexandria in 367CE.  There are other writings that we not included eg Gospels of Thomas and Peter.  The criteria for inclusion in the Canon were, written by the Apostles or someone close, written as close to the time of Jesus as possible, widely read and the writings included teaching that was widely accepted ie orthodox.

Categories
Faith Explorers Recent Topics

4 April 2016: Book “How to be a Bad Christian” by Dave Tomlinson, led by Heidrun

This book has a provocative title and is part of a series of “How to be a Bad ….” where ‘Bad’ has the implication of being non-conformist compared with the established behaviours of the particular book’s subject matter.  In this case the author’s position is to expose the differences between a set of beliefs and ‘faith in one’s belly’.  We noted that we all have a set of religious/Christian beliefs as well as a greater or lesser degree of faith.  What might be the nature of such a faith – suggestions – a gut feeling, something/power in the universe, the goodness in all livings things especially sentient beings, that the universe is heading in the right direction, evolution is called into a journey, our journey through life is somehow ‘guided’.

The author also devotes considerable space to a discussion on the characteristics of Spiritual Intelligence SI – a parallel concept to IQ and EQ.  This prompted much discussion on whether a high SI was reflected in a higher level of faith compared with beliefs. Questions challenging what others say/contend (eg sermons) and creeds generally do not trouble those with a strong faith; there are no ‘keystone’ beliefs to loosen imperilling one’s whole belief structure.  What are the bedrocks to still being a Christian – if any?  Suggestions – compassion, love, treat others as you would wish to be treated (The Golden Rule), a sense of community, characteristics which Jesus portrayed.  We noted that boundaries need to be challenged if anything is to move forward – be that religious beliefs, technology, cooking etc.  One can foster one’s spiritual growth ie strengthen SI, through prayer, silence, mediation, wellness, appreciating nature.  There are 4 factors the author contends that give meaning to life – self-worth, personal authenticity, relationships and a sense of purpose (vocation).

Categories
Faith Explorers Recent Topics

21 March 2016: Generous Hospitality Session 3 DVD: The Visitor

As a change from discussion, we watched the film ‘The Visitor’.  This is a moving account of ill-legal immigrants, who had been in the country for a number of years, apprehended after a no-fault incident, held in a detection centre and eventually deported despite the best attempts of friends and family.  Besides the hospitality offered the illegible couple, there is also an underlying theme of the powerless – v – the powerful.

Hospitality is initially offered reluctantly, but as relationships and trust build, wider aspects of hospitality are also offered.  The initial hospitality is also offered back – by cooking dinner, buying a newspaper, teaching drumming; common interests are discovered and shared eg music.  All the characters are changed by these interactions with each other.  Although hospitality is offered with no expectations, in this case (and maybe most cases) all parties are much the richer for the experience.

The film also had a powerful impact on those watching – mindful of the experiences of helplessness of those apprehended and held in detention centres in Australia.

Categories
Faith Explorers Recent Topics

14 March 2016: Generous Hospitality Session 5: Recognising Jesus led by Cristina

We are not as open a society as we once were – witness the demise of front-facing verandas (moved to the great privacy of the back garden) to be replaced by (automatic) garage doors and or 1.8m high fences with keypad operated gates.

We acknowledged that the idealistic image of veranda-sitting wasn’t the only way of getting to know your neighbours – but this is much harder than it used to be with different working times, busy lives, more people renting and therefore more transient and increasing use of technology to allow choice of friendships not just with one’s physical neighbours!

We acknowledged that our homes are both a place of retreat from busyness and work but also a place to entertain and be hospitable.

On the road to Emmaus, the disciples had an opportunity to think about the events in Jerusalem around the Passover in a less emotional atmosphere, they were then joined by a fellow traveller which extended their discussion and thinking further; when they sat down to eat suddenly something made them recall similar situations when Jesus had been present and they realised that their memories would not allow these experiences to be lost. One’s experience of God is an emotional one, of the spirit – not a physical, analytical one.  The emotional experience can result in some reactive/irrational action eg in this case the disciples hurrying back to Jerusalem despite the dangers of being on the road after dark.

How to offer hospitality in todays’ setting?  With strangers a public place is preferable(safer) eg café, or as a group in a hired hall or marquee.  An ‘open’ home has some risks – burglary, invasion of private space, physical safety, embarrassment of personal ‘mess’.  The upside is that visitors to a home will get to know more about you via memorabilia, photos, books, the music you enjoy etc.  We need to try to be more creative in welcoming strangers especially those who come to church and by being more conscious about keeping in contact with people eg a phone call.

Categories
Faith Explorers Recent Topics

7 March 2016: Generous Hospitality Session 4: Making Room for Others led by Ian

We considered the similarities and differences between dining at Know college and the work of Mother Teresa’s order in Kolkata.  Both offer hospitality involving serving and receiving, start with prayer, are communities with a spiritual dimension, discussion and person-to-person interaction takes place.  Both have rituals and enable a cross fertilisation of ideas.

The physical context in which both take place is very different – Knox (as portrayed) very old school English, sense of tradition, dressing up to make / reflect / acknowledge a special occasion.

We acknowledged that the incidences and parables in Luke challenged the establish social norms of the times by reversing them – turning them up side down.  The rabbi invites Jesus to a meal (why would he do that?), Jesus keeps him waiting by healing someone (not very polite to keep the host waiting), Jesus heals on the Sabbath, Jesus challenges the established seating hierarchy, the rich wont come to the feast so the outcasts of society are invited.  The invitation also eludes to the Pharisees ignoring Jesus’s message, which is accepted by those on the edge of society – the blind and lame, etc – i.e. the Gentiles.

We were concerned about the openness of the parable invitation to a meal – it’s not appropriate to invite strangers into one’s home.  Perhaps the issue of hospitality could be turned around by asking– ‘Who can I be a neighbour to?’  An immediate response could be assisting the recently arrived Syrian refugees.

Categories
Blog

29 February 2016: Generous Hospitality Session 3: Welcoming the Stranger led by Adrienne

Offering hospitality to strangers is very hard – so we need role models and experience.  Mother Theresa and Brother Roger of Taize were mentioned.  We noted that Roger was killed by an outsider who had accepted hospitality with the Brothers.  We contrasted the story of the history of the persecution of Huguenots who still offered hospitality to Jews fleeing Nazi’s in occupied France with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Strangers can be intimidating. The ‘natural’ inclination is to be make negative assumptions about strangers – though it’s a matter of good practice to be a little cautious until two-way trust is achieved.  Need to be discerning.

Regarding being hospitable to strangers, we need to be careful about not only who to invite but also the environment where the hospitality will be offered.  A neutral venue is easier for all involved – so not in one’s home but a café, restaurant.  The WCC street parties are a good and neutral opportunity to engage in hospitality.

Categories
Blog

22 February 2016: Generous Hospitality Session 2: Gifts of Hospitality led by Linda

no notes

Categories
Faith Explorers Recent Topics

15 February 2016: Lenten Study Generous Hospitality Session 1: The Generosity of God led by Ron

We explored some examples of ‘hospitality’ – suggestions included welcoming, acceptance, open, being active, social, interactive, spending time.  We acknowledged that hospitality is easier to express with people we know.  How to offer hospitality with neighbours and people we don’t know?  What should the churches role be in engaging in refugee situations – in NZ and elsewhere, child poverty?

We discussed some of the issues of engaging with people – some just accept what they are told and don’t engage by asking questions; perhaps they are uncomfortable with complications so ‘KISS’.  We reflect views of our experiences, need to values their experiences (even if they don’t agree with ours) to meet them where they are.  Apathy is a greater danger than diverse views.